Has a lockdown approach to COVID-19 in Australia and the UK been successful in breaking the chain of infection?

With the second lockdown lifted, the UK has been put into a tier system of three levels. As some of us exit our homes, stumbling, blinking into the sun, collectively breathing a sigh of relief that we’ve passed the worst of the second wave, and our incredible NHS is still standing, we can now look reflectively back, and ask ourselves; what can we learn from other countries that appear to have managed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) well?

Initial response

On 30 January, the World Health Organisation (WHO) declared a public health emergency of international concern and governments were urged to prepare for global spread of COVID-19. Each country had the undesirable task of preparing their own unique programmes and plans which had to be logically influenced by a variety of economical, political and social factors to get their respective populations through 2020. We were entering into the unknown, a period of deep anxiety. Australia responded early, conducting more than 200,000 tests in March. Their plan was divided into four stages consisting of initial phase, targeted action, stand down and preparedness.

Entering lockdown

In Australia’s early stages of their response plan, certain flights to and from the country were refused and border-crossings for non-Australian residents were declined, with inbound Australians put in a 14-day quarantine. They utilised the media to raise awareness and increase public understanding to combat the disease, and entered lockdown in late March, making wearing masks compulsory throughout the country.

Frontline response

Their targeted action phase highly focused on providing adequate resources and supplies for hospital settings (testing capacities, PPE, specialised clinics for patients), and as well as implementing contact tracing technology. To date, over 9 million tests have been conducted nationally in Australia, of which less than 1% tested positive, with a total of 27,921 cases and 908 deaths. 25,409 positive cases made full recoveries.

Drawing comparisons

Like comparing apples and pears, two countries will have different factors that make direct comparisons impossible. Factors such as the economy and Governmental policies will influence key decisions.

Lockdowns have proved effective at halting the spread of COVID-19 in Australia. But they have come at a huge economic and social cost. In Britain, like the US, debate raged over whether the cost of greater restrictions is worth it and many countries are choosing to take protective measures and live with the virus instead. However, we can definitely learn valuable lessons from these countries in how to avoid a higher rate of cases and deaths through appropriate implementation of preventative measures.

New Covid-19 cases per day, per million people, for selected countries, Source: ECDC data compiled by Our World in Data

Coming out the other side

Australia celebrated 24 hours without a new locally acquired case of Covid-19 between 8pm Friday and 8pm Saturday (30th-31st Oct). It could be argued that their control of the pandemic was due to their rapid, well-analysed and early response.

The UK has come far in reducing the number of reported cases per day and is behind only France out of European countries for lives tragically claimed by the disease. Europe as a whole suffered a high number of cases, particularly in Italy and Spain. No doubt trade concerns influenced the decision to leave our borders open to international travel, and the UK placed focus on backing businesses to avoid closures and support the economy.

An effective pandemic response requires not only speed and clarity but also a willingness to accept mistakes and a commitment to international cooperation. Sharing the science and the uncertainties that inform political decisions will help rebuild lost public trust. Lockdown and tougher measures varied from country to country; in the UK, the major setback was balancing what we wanted and what we needed for the nation as a whole, and finding the compromises.

According to the published statistical data of COVID-19 cases, it can be concluded that this pandemic can be successfully controlled through adhering and following logical measures of lockdown, such as social distancing, wearing masks and ensuring healthcare systems are not overwhelmed. We’re seeing reports from React-1 that this second lockdown resulted in the overall infection rate dropping by a third, and halving in areas where the infection rate was highest.

Written by Tautvydas Karitonas December 3rd 2020

Tautvydas Karitonas is an experienced professional with a decade of involvement in developing cutting-edge healthcare products that are now widely used in hospitals globally. He presently serves as the Managing Director at Test Labs, a Medical Device Contract Research Organization dedicated to accelerating access to market for medical devices. With a keen interest in developing validation methods to address the challenges of the 4th industrial revolution, Tautvydas is an active member of standards development organizations.

Tautvydas holds BSc and MSc degrees in Mechanical Engineering, which provides him with a distinctive approach that links product design and development process with device verification and validation. He has used his experience in developing hydrogen peroxide and UV-C light technologies to influence the laboratory design and expedite research timelines. Tautvydas is proud of leading the Test Labs team in achieving a prestigious UKAS accreditation in under 12 months.

Tautvydas is an expert in product development, validation, and problem-solving, making him a valuable member of any team he works with. He shares his knowledge and passion for the industry through his posts, where he discusses a range of topics from the latest medical device regulations to the impact of emerging technologies on the healthcare industry.

Categories Blog Insight